== Foamy sucks, but so does this 'Documentary' ==
Score: 5
I agree with the overall message, but the 'documentary' is very poorly researched. I'm not here to defend ol' Jonathan Ian Mathers, just clear up some information that Jare got wrong.
- He's got a high pitched voice, talks really fast and is extremely annoying.
Fair point, but that is very debatable. I find it to be tolerable, but I understand where this is coming from. However, later on you make the point that squirrels shouldn't talk at all because real squirrels don't do that. This is a cartoon and that's artistic license.
- Has no redeeming qualities, always bullies Germaine for being horny + dumb, while he himself is horny
I don't know about Foamy himself being horny, but Germaine has whored herself out in one way or another in certain parts of the series, usually for monetary gain because she's too unstable to get a job or make money out of poetry.
- Animator is lazy / won't draw mouth, / uses clickbait
I agree. This is an easy time-saving technique done to rush animations out every 2 weeks. Other techniques include drawing only 1 or 2 backgrounds per episode, fewer keyframes, fewer in-betweens (ditching them outright in the modern episodes), and good ol' fashioned motion tweens. As if your 1-2 games/movies per day is any better.
- Every episode is the same and doesn't make any sense.
Each episode can be split into several categories, though they usually follow the same formula. Usually he's either by himself delivering a rant, or messing with Germaine, but he's also done some other stuff too.
During the original series (2003-2011) he may also read fanmail, phone up an Indian tech support worker, or complain about coffee at Starschmucks. as well as try to establish a 'Foamy Cult' sometimes. There was also one episode in 2003 where he just throws nuts at people to blow their heads off. There was some variety back then, but it's still a little bit repetitive during later seasons.
Nowadays in the current series (2017-present), Foamy makes a whole lot more rants and rarely interacts with Germaine, who now mostly just stays at home all the time.
- Doesn't have his own squirrel family or act like a real squirrel.
Foamy does interact with other squirrels sometimes, those being drug addict Pilz-E (blue eyes + glasses), Begley (purple hair), and Hatta (stereotypical black guy whom you mentioned in 4:30), usually Pilz-E. Hatta rarely makes appearances. They're more like a group of buddies you meet together at the pub (or the rehab if the pub ain't cuttin' it) rather than a traditional loving caring family you describe using a book cover, and they aren't always around each episode.
- Doesn't talk about or eat nuts
Foamy usually eats bagels with cream cheese, although he may order a pizza sometimes. Again, it's a cartoon and artistic license takes effect.
- Is horribly designed, uses the 'no mouth' point again, has green eyes when real squirrels don't.
A quick Google search for various squirrel pictures (IRL) show a lot of them have dark brown eyes, and also they don't have a large amount of white like humans have. But that doesn't matter, for this is a cartoon and that's called artistic license. I have my own character, a frog with stubble and belly hair, white arms, and two thirds the height of a human, yet real frogs aren't that big or hairy. Again, it's a cartoon, doesn't need to be super realistic.
- None of the characters' backstories are explained.
On illwillpress.com, click the bottom bar 'Best Viewed in 2005' to view the old site layout, then click 'Characters', or just click the link I've provided. There's information about every single character that's appeared in Foamy/Neurotically Yours and some of J.i.M's other series.
https://illwillpress.com/characters.html
- Illwillpress is/was a racist in the earlier episodes and squirrels shouldn't be African-American.
The Hatta' is the 'black stereotype' squirrel. His 'afro' is on his tail. Two thirds down his playlist "Neurotically Yours Original SE 1-3" you can find two episodes where he's the main focus.
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/768801
He has barely made an appearance in later episodes and may possibly be phased out entirely, to my knowledge. Artistic license!
- Nobody asks 'Why is it a terrible show on Newgrounds?'
They have, even back in the early 2000s when it first started to become a hit. If you search 'Foamy' on the BBS, you will find various threads and users calling Foamy shit and providing some convincing reasons for it.
In fact, there was a group called the UCFD, or the Underground Coalition for Foamy's Demise, that made anti-Foamy parodies. Here is a collab they did in 2006 celebrating one of his movies being blammed.
https://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/305822
He's most recently got into some hot water when he reuploaded his old episodes back onto Newgrounds after deleting them in 2016, allowing him to win Daily awards and mess with the charts. Since then he has stopped reuploading as frequently (3 every week instead), and started opting out of awards (which was added in 2021). Although he still wins Daily awards with new episodes, he hasn't been a big deal for present day Newgrounds.
Hopefully that clears everything up!
Graphics: 2 | Sound: 4 | Research: 3 | Original Assets: 0 | Hypocrisy: 5 | Spam-O-Meter levels: 8